On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:11 AM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Robert Haas wrote: >> >>> After sleeping on this, I'm inclined to go with Amit's fix for now. >>> It seems less likely to break anything in the back-branches than any >>> other option I can think up. >> >> Yeah, no objections here. > > +1.
OK, committed and back-patched all the way. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
