On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: >> Closed in 2016-11 commitfest with "returned with feedback" status. >> Please feel free to update the status once you submit the updated patch. > > Given the thread discussions, I do not understand why this "ready for > committer" patch is switched to "return with feedback", as there is nothing > actionnable, and I've done everything required to improve the syntax and > implementation, and to justify why these functions are useful. > > I'm spending time to try to make something useful of pgbench, which require > a bunch of patches that work together to improve it for new use case, > including not being limited to the current set of operators. > > This decision is both illogical and arbitrary.
I disagree. I think his decision was probably based on this email from me: -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
