On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I wrote: >>> Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: >>>> The table of Pseudo-Types needs to be updated as well with unknown in >>>> datatype.sgml. >> >>> Check. >> >> Here's an updated patch with doc changes. Aside from that one, >> I tried to spell "pseudo-type" consistently, and I changed one >> place where we were calling something a pseudo-type that isn't. > > Thanks for the updated version, all the comments have been addressed. > You have left a lot of code comments using "pseudotype" instead of > "pseudo-type" in the code. I am guessing that this is on purpose, > which is fine for me. There is no point to make back-patching more > complicated for just that. > > The CF app has been updated to ready for committer for the record.
I have listed myself as reviewer for this commitfest entry and I am yet to review the patch. Can you please wait for the listed reviewers, esp. when those reviewers are active, for changing the commitfest entry status? -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers