On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> I wrote: >>>> Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: >>>>> The table of Pseudo-Types needs to be updated as well with unknown in >>>>> datatype.sgml. >>> >>>> Check. >>> >>> Here's an updated patch with doc changes. Aside from that one, >>> I tried to spell "pseudo-type" consistently, and I changed one >>> place where we were calling something a pseudo-type that isn't. >> >> Thanks for the updated version, all the comments have been addressed. >> You have left a lot of code comments using "pseudotype" instead of >> "pseudo-type" in the code. I am guessing that this is on purpose, >> which is fine for me. There is no point to make back-patching more >> complicated for just that. >> >> The CF app has been updated to ready for committer for the record. > > I have listed myself as reviewer for this commitfest entry and I am > yet to review the patch. Can you please wait for the listed reviewers, > esp. when those reviewers are active, for changing the commitfest > entry status?
If you want to have an extra look, please be my guest. To be consistent, I have added my name as well in the list of reviewers. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
