On 2017-01-26 12:24:44 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Currently a waiting standby doesn't allow interrupts. > > > > Patch implements that. > > > > Barring objection, patching today with backpatches. > > "today" is a little quick, but the patch looks fine. I doubt anyone's > going to screech too loud about adding a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() call.
Advertising
I don't quite get asking for agreement, and then not waiting as suggested. I'm personally fine with going with a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS for now, but I think it'd better to replace it with a latch. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
