On 26 January 2017 at 20:36, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On 26 January 2017 at 19:20, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> > I'm personally fine with going with a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS
>> > for now, but I think it'd better to replace it with a latch.
>> I have waited, so not sure what you mean. Tomorrow is too late.
>> Replacing with a latch wouldn't be backpatchable, IMHO.
> Hmm, you pushed this to the master branch as commit e8ee3d6b859a, but I
> see no backpatch.

There appeared to be a complaint at my speed, so I slowed down.

On reading that there are no objections to this being backpatched, I
will do that now.

Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to