On 26 January 2017 at 20:36, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: >> On 26 January 2017 at 19:20, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > >> > I'm personally fine with going with a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS >> > for now, but I think it'd better to replace it with a latch. >> >> I have waited, so not sure what you mean. Tomorrow is too late. >> >> Replacing with a latch wouldn't be backpatchable, IMHO. > > Hmm, you pushed this to the master branch as commit e8ee3d6b859a, but I > see no backpatch.
There appeared to be a complaint at my speed, so I slowed down. On reading that there are no objections to this being backpatched, I will do that now. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
