Simon Riggs wrote: > On 26 January 2017 at 19:20, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > I'm personally fine with going with a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS > > for now, but I think it'd better to replace it with a latch. > > I have waited, so not sure what you mean. Tomorrow is too late. > > Replacing with a latch wouldn't be backpatchable, IMHO. Hmm, you pushed this to the master branch as commit e8ee3d6b859a, but I see no backpatch. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
