* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > And I think that's all pretty reasonable. I don't consider this a > done deal yet. I don't consider your -1 irrelevant. But I don't > think it's fair to present this as if I am somehow running roughshod > over community process, either. If a large crew of people show up to > insist that we should rename only the directories and nothing else, I > guess I'll have to live with that. But I think that's a bad decision > that will never survive the passage of time, and there seem to be > several people who agree with me.
+1 (to the above, and the rest of Robert's comments on that email). For my 2c, I'm also in the crowd of forward or back, but don't leave it half-done. My preference is certainly to move forward with these changes, but I understand the process and if there's enough agreement that we just shouldn't make these changes, then we really shouldn't make any of them. Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature