On 1/26/17 5:07 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: >> And I think that's all pretty reasonable. I don't consider this a >> done deal yet. I don't consider your -1 irrelevant. But I don't >> think it's fair to present this as if I am somehow running roughshod >> over community process, either. If a large crew of people show up to >> insist that we should rename only the directories and nothing else, I >> guess I'll have to live with that. But I think that's a bad decision >> that will never survive the passage of time, and there seem to be >> several people who agree with me. > > +1 (to the above, and the rest of Robert's comments on that email). > > For my 2c, I'm also in the crowd of forward or back, but don't leave it > half-done. My preference is certainly to move forward with these > changes, but I understand the process and if there's enough agreement > that we just shouldn't make these changes, then we really shouldn't make > any of them.
+1 for forward or back. I prefer forward but would take back over the state we're in now. -- -David da...@pgmasters.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
