On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I *personally* don't think it's worth > changing all this without taking more care about backward compat than > we're apparently willing to do. I'm ok with loosing that argument. I > just don't think the previous concensus for a narrower change can be > used for the wider one > . > It would probably help others if you could brain dump a bit as to the benefit of the status-quo compared to both the 9.6 behavior and the all-in one. Honestly, the reference to the camel sticking their nose in a tent was supposed to be taken humorously, the serious explanation that it meant to convey was already very well presented by Robert. The only reason I added the wiki link was to give those who would have no clue about the metaphor a chance at understanding it. I actually took your response as: "why the f**k is he talking about camels?" and started laughing... Dave
