On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:

> I *personally* don't think it's worth
> changing all this without taking more care about backward compat than
> we're apparently willing to do.  I'm ok with loosing that argument.  I
> just don't think the previous concensus for a narrower change can be
> used for the wider one
> ​.

​It would probably help others if you could brain dump a bit as to the
benefit of the status-quo compared to both the 9.6 behavior and the all-in

Honestly, the reference to the camel sticking their nose in a tent was
supposed to be taken humorously, the serious explanation that it meant to
convey was already very well presented by Robert.  The only reason I added
the wiki link was to give those who would have no clue about the metaphor a
chance at understanding it.

I actually took your response as:  "why the f**k is he talking about
camels?" and started laughing...


Reply via email to