On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I *personally* don't think it's worth
> changing all this without taking more care about backward compat than
> we're apparently willing to do. I'm ok with loosing that argument. I
> just don't think the previous concensus for a narrower change can be
> used for the wider one
It would probably help others if you could brain dump a bit as to the
benefit of the status-quo compared to both the 9.6 behavior and the all-in
Honestly, the reference to the camel sticking their nose in a tent was
supposed to be taken humorously, the serious explanation that it meant to
convey was already very well presented by Robert. The only reason I added
the wiki link was to give those who would have no clue about the metaphor a
chance at understanding it.
I actually took your response as: "why the f**k is he talking about
camels?" and started laughing...