On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Michael Paquier >> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Please find attached a patch with those fixes. >> >> Committed, but I changed the copyright dates to 2016-2017 rather than >> just 2017 since surely some of the code was originally written before >> 2017. Even that might not really be going back far enough, but it >> doesn't matter too much. > > Just for curiosity: does the moment when the code has been written or > committed counts? It's no big deal seeing how liberal the Postgres > license is, but this makes me wonder...
IANAL, but I think if you ask one, he or she will tell you that what matters is the date the work was created. In the case of code, that means when the code was written. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
