Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2017-02-15 22:46:38 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Now that we've renamed "xlog" to "wal" in user-facing elements, I think >> we should strive to use the name "wal" internally too in new code, not >> "xlog" anymore. This patch introduces several variables, macros, >> functions that ought to change names now -- XLogSegmentOffset should be >> WALSegmentOffset for example. (I expect that as we touch code over >> time, the use of "xlog" will decrease, though not fully disappear).
> I think this will just decrease the consistency in xlog.c (note the > name) et al. It's also going to make back-patching bug fixes in the area a real nightmare. Let's not change the code more than necessary to implement the desired user-facing behavior. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers