On 2/4/17 1:47 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
I'm tempted to put the old logic back, but more because this likely was unintentional, not because I think it's clearly better.+1 Yes, it was unintentional change. So we should put old logic back unless we have proof that this change make it better. Patch is attached. I tried to make some comments, but probably they are not enough.
Added to CF: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/13/1029/ -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
