> Michael Meskes wrote: > > The other option I can see, albeit without looking into details, is > > allowing all comments and then testing it for the right syntax > > after > > parsing. This could potentially also solve the above mentioned > > option > > problem. > > This idea sounds great. But I am not sure that I can understand it > correctly. > > I understood the concept of this idea as following. Is it right? > 1. The parser ignores comments/*...*/ as usual. That is, parser does > not > identify comments as a token.
I guess it'd be easier to accept each comment as a token and then parse the token text afterwards. > 2. After parsing, we parse again only to extract comments. Not sure if we can do that without creating a lot of overhead. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org VfL Borussia! Força Barça! SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers