On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> After thinking about that for awhile, it seemed like the most useful thing
> to do is to set up an errcontext callback that will be active throughout
> execution of the start_proc.  That will cover both setup failures like
> the above, and errors occurring within the start_proc, which could be
> equally confusing if you think they apply to the function you initially
> tried to call.  v2 patch attached that does it like that.

+1 for that approach.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to