On 3/10/17 14:40, Andres Freund wrote: > I'd really like to get it in. The performance improvements on its own > are significant, and it provides the basis for significantly larger > improvements again (JIT) - those followup improvements are large patches > again though, so I'd rather not do all of that next cycle. > > My next step (over the weekend) is to add tests to execQual.c to get it > a good chunk closer to 100% test coverage, and then do the same for the > new implementation (there's probably very little additional tests needed > after the conversion). Given all tests pass before/after, and there's a > lot of them, I think we can have a reasonable confidence of a low bug > density.
That seems like a plan, but now would probably be a good time for some other hackers to take note of this proposal. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers