Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > I wish 'pg' wasn't an already used binary name. It'd be much nicer if > we had a '/usr/bin/pg' wrapper binary in the git style, that we could easily > expand over time, without hitting new conflicts. I'd even consider a > '/usr/bin/pgsql' that has commands for all our binaries a considerable > improvement in the long term.
Meh. I'm not seeing where "pg command args" is that much superior to "pg_command args". Yeah, if we'd done it like that from the beginning it'd be fine; but people are used to the latter style and I don't feel a need to make them change over. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers