On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Thomas Munro
>> <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>> I noticed a failure in the inet.sql test while running the regression
>>> tests with parallelism cranked up, and can reproduce it interactively
>>> as follows.  After an spgist index is created and the plan changes to
>>> the one shown below, the query returns no rows.
>> Thanks for reporting.  Seems like we are getting issues related to
>> I think in this area we need more testing, reason these are not tested
>> properly because these are not the natural case for parallel bitmap.
>> I think in next few days I will test more such cases by forcing the
>> parallel bitmap.
> Okay, is your testing complete?
>> Here is the patch to fix the issue in hand.  I have also run the
>> regress suit with force_parallel_mode=regress and all the test are
>> passing.
> Thomas, did you get chance to verify Dilip's latest patch?
> I have added this issue in PostgreSQL 10 Open Items list so that we
> don't loose track of this issue.

The result is correct with this patch.  I ran make installcheck then
the same steps as above and the query result was correct after
creating the index.

Thomas Munro

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to