On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Thomas Munro > <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> I noticed a failure in the inet.sql test while running the regression >> tests with parallelism cranked up, and can reproduce it interactively >> as follows. After an spgist index is created and the plan changes to >> the one shown below, the query returns no rows. > > Thanks for reporting. Seems like we are getting issues related to > TBM_ONE_PAGE and TBM_EMPTY. > > I think in this area we need more testing, reason these are not tested > properly because these are not the natural case for parallel bitmap. > I think in next few days I will test more such cases by forcing the > parallel bitmap. >
Okay, is your testing complete? > Here is the patch to fix the issue in hand. I have also run the > regress suit with force_parallel_mode=regress and all the test are > passing. > Thomas, did you get chance to verify Dilip's latest patch? I have added this issue in PostgreSQL 10 Open Items list so that we don't loose track of this issue. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
