On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> I think in this area we need more testing, reason these are not tested >>> properly because these are not the natural case for parallel bitmap. >>> I think in next few days I will test more such cases by forcing the >>> parallel bitmap. >>> >> >> Okay, is your testing complete?
Yes, I have done more testing around this area with more cases, like one page with BitmapOr etc. Now it looks fine to me. >> >>> Here is the patch to fix the issue in hand. I have also run the >>> regress suit with force_parallel_mode=regress and all the test are >>> passing. >>> >> >> Thomas, did you get chance to verify Dilip's latest patch? >> >> I have added this issue in PostgreSQL 10 Open Items list so that we >> don't loose track of this issue. > > The result is correct with this patch. I ran make installcheck then > the same steps as above and the query result was correct after > creating the index. Thanks for confirming. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers