Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> ... I don't have much
> personal enthusiasm for trying to figure out how to make dynamic
> loading on the postgres binary itself work everywhere, so if it falls
> to me to fix, it's likely to get a hard-coded check for some
> hard-coded name.
+1. This seems like no time to be buying into brand new portability
requirements without a very pressing need to do so; and this patch
doesn't appear to create one.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
