Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > ... I don't have much > personal enthusiasm for trying to figure out how to make dynamic > loading on the postgres binary itself work everywhere, so if it falls > to me to fix, it's likely to get a hard-coded check for some > hard-coded name.
+1. This seems like no time to be buying into brand new portability requirements without a very pressing need to do so; and this patch doesn't appear to create one. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers