On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> Btw now that I look at the code, I guess we'll want to get rid of
>> bgw_main completely in HEAD given that we can't guarantee it will be
>> valid even for shared_preload_library libraries. For older branches I
>> would leave things as they are in this regard as there don't seem to be
>> any immediate issue for standard binaries.
>
> As long as you fix it so culicidae is happy (in 9.6) ;). I think it's
> fine to just introduce bgw_builtin_id or such, and leave the bgw_main
> code in place in < HEAD.
I wasn't thinking of introducing bgw_builtin_id. My idea was just
along the lines of
if (bgw_library_name == NULL && bgw_function_name != NULL)
{
if (strcmp(bgw_function_name, "ParallelQueryMain") == 0)
ParallelQueryMain(blah);
else if (strcmp(bgw_function_name, "LogicalReplicationMain") == 0)
LogicalReplicationMain(blah);
}
I think something like that is certainly better for the back-branches,
because it doesn't cause an ABI break. But I think it would also be
fine for master.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
