On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Amit Langote
<langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Actually, p1 is a partitioned table, so the error. And I realize that
> that's a wrong behavior. Currently the check is performed using only the
> relkind, which is bogus. Specifying ONLY should cause an error only when
> the table has partitions.
That sounds like a REALLY bad idea, because now you're going to end up
with a constraint that can never be enforced against any actual data
rows ... or else you're going to later pretend that ONLY wasn't
specified. I think the rule that partitioned tables can't have
non-inherited constraints is absolutely right, and relaxing it is
quite wrong.
I think you had the right idea upthread when you suggested dumping it this way:
CREATE TABLE p1 PARTITION OF p (
b NOT NULL
)
FOR VALUES IN (1)
PARTITION BY RANGE (b);
That looks absolutely right to me, and very much principled.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
