On 4/13/17 17:52, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 12/04/17 06:10, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 3/24/17 10:49, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>> Rebase after table copy patch got committed.
>> You could please sent another rebase of this, perhaps with some more
>> documentation, as discussed downthread.
>> Also, I wonder why we don't offer the other values of
>> synchronous_commit.  In any case, we should keep the values consistent.
>> So on should be on and local should be local, but not mixing it.
> Now that I am back from vacation I took look at this again. The reason
> why I did only boolean initially is that he other values just didn't
> seem all that useful. But you are right it's better to be consistent and
> there is no real reason why not to allow all of the possible values.
> So how about the attached?


Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to