On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> On 2017-04-20 17:27:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> In short: yeah, let's nuke the WAIT_USE_SELECT implementation. >>> It's dead code and it's unlikely to get resurrected. > >> Ok, cool. v10 or wait till v11? I see very little reason to wait >> personally. > > I feel no need to wait on that. Code removal is not a "new feature".
One can imagine a situation in which code removal seemed to carry a risk of destabilizing something, but the change under discussion here seems more likely to improve stability rather than to regress anything. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
