On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 08:12:05PM +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 25/04/17 17:01, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> >> I also wonder if ability to run SQL queries on walsender connected to a
> >> database is worth mentioning (replication=database kind of connection).
> > 
> > Uh, why would that be important to users?
> Because every tool that uses logical decoding to capture changes does not
> need to open extra connection to fetch initial state.
> (and we document much less user visible changes than this in the release
> notes)

Are you saying that 3rd party applications that use logical WAL records
need to know about that?  Can you provide some text?

> >> Or the ability of logical decoding to follow timeline switches.
> > 
> > I didn't think logical decoding was really more than a proof-of-concept
> > until now.
> > 
> Huh?

Uh, the only logical decoding code that I know we ship pre-PG 10 is

  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to