On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 08:12:05PM +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote: > On 25/04/17 17:01, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > >> I also wonder if ability to run SQL queries on walsender connected to a > >> database is worth mentioning (replication=database kind of connection). > > > > Uh, why would that be important to users? > > Because every tool that uses logical decoding to capture changes does not > need to open extra connection to fetch initial state. > > (and we document much less user visible changes than this in the release > notes)
Are you saying that 3rd party applications that use logical WAL records need to know about that? Can you provide some text? > >> Or the ability of logical decoding to follow timeline switches. > > > > I didn't think logical decoding was really more than a proof-of-concept > > until now. > > > > Huh? Uh, the only logical decoding code that I know we ship pre-PG 10 is contrib/test_decoding/. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
