On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> > Maybe a better strategy would be to get a release out soon but not wait
> > 6 months for another release which would contain the Win32 port and the
> > PITR stuff (assuming those aren't done in time for this release).
> >
> > Just a thought.
> And definitely in agreement here ... I'd rather see a shortened dev cycle
> prompted by a big feature being added, then delaying a release because "oh
> oh, I need another few weeks" that draws out when something unexpected
> happens :(

I'm not sure why another delay is being considered. There's been a delay of
a week because of the server problems hasn't there and wasn't the original
delay only acceptable on the basis that that was that and there wasn't going to
be another extension?

Nigel Andrews

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to