On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Amit Langote
<langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> You're right.  I agree that whatever text we add here should be pointing
> out that statement-level triggers of affected child tables are not fired,
> when root parent is specified in the command.
> Since there was least some talk of changing that behavior for regular
> inheritance so that statement triggers of any affected children are fired
> [1], I thought we shouldn't say something general that applies to both
> inheritance and partitioning.  But since nothing has happened in that
> regard, we might as well.
> How about the attached?

Looks better, but I think we should say "statement" instead of
"operation" for consistency with the previous paragraph, and it
certainly shouldn't be capitalized.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to