On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 01:23:19PM +0200, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On 2017-05-03 08:17, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> >On 02/05/17 20:43, Robert Haas wrote:
> >>On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> >>>code path that calls CommitTransactionCommand() should have one, no?
> >>
> >>Is there anything left to be committed here?
> >>
> >
> >Afaics the fix was not committed. Peter wanted more comprehensive fix
> >which didn't happen. I think something like attached should do the job.
> I'm running my pgbench-over-logical-replication test in chunk of 15 minutes,
> wth different pgbench -c (num clients) and -s (scale) values.
> With this patch (and nothing else)  on top of master (8f8b9be51fd7 to be
> precise):
> >fix-statistics-reporting-in-logical-replication-work.patch
> logical replication is still often failing (as expected, I suppose; it seems
> because of "inital snapshot too large") but indeed I do not see the 'TRAP:
> FailedAssertion in pgstat.c' anymore.
> (If there is any other configuration of patches worth testing please let me
> know)

[Action required within three days.  This is a generic notification.]

The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.  Peter,
since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
item.  If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
v10 open item, please let us know.  Otherwise, please observe the policy on
open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
this message.  Include a date for your subsequent status update.  Testers may
discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
well in advance of shipping v10.  Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
toward speedy resolution.  Thanks.


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to