On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Actually, I now remember that I wrote that while at Salesforce (because >>> they'd run into the problem that constant ArrayRef expressions weren't >>> simplified). So that means it's been languishing in a git branch for >>> *two* years. I'm kind of inclined to push it before it gets forgotten >>> again ;-) > >> You will probably not be surprised to hear that I think this is a >> feature and thus subject to the feature freeze currently in effect. > > [ shrug ] Sure. I'll do what I should have done then, which is stick > it into the next CF list.
Thanks. > If you intend to also object to my proposed get_attstatsslot refactoring, > please do that promptly. That one I think is bug-proofing. I wasn't planning to express an opinion on that one. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
