On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 08:39:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> > There we go:
> > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=calliphoridae&dt=2017-05-16%2023:16:53&stg=typedefs
> Yup, looks good now.  Thanks!
> BTW, comparing the typedef list to what I got a few hours ago, I see
> that "Function" is now a known type name, along with the UWhatever
> symbols from ICU.  I wonder where that came from?  A quick grep
> suggests that it's not going to mess anything up too badly, but it
> sure seems like a poor choice for a globally visible typedef name.

OK, I assume we are good to go for Wednesday afternoon, UTC.  Thanks for
the research.

  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to