On 26 May 2017 at 08:27, Erik Rijkers <e...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > On 2017-05-26 08:58, Simon Riggs wrote: >> >> On 26 May 2017 at 07:10, Erik Rijkers <e...@xs4all.nl> wrote: >> >>> - Do you agree this number of failures is far too high? >>> - Am I the only one finding so many failures? >> >> >> What type of failure are you getting? > > > The failure is that in the result state the replicated tables differ from > the original tables.
An important point would be note that that this is time dependent. > I would really like to know it you think that that doesn't amount to > 'failure'. Yes, your test has failed. Even one record on one test is a serious problem and needs to be fixed. If we can find out what the bug is with a repeatable test case we can fix it. Could you provide more details? Thanks -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
