On 26/05/17 20:09, Erik Rijkers wrote:

On 2017-05-26 09:40, Simon Riggs wrote:

If we can find out what the bug is with a repeatable test case we can fix it.

Could you provide more details? Thanks

I will, just need some time to clean things up a bit.

But what I would like is for someone else to repeat my 100x1-minute tests, taking as core that snippet I posted in my previous email. I built bash-stuff around that core (to take md5's, shut-down/start-up the two instances between runs, write info to log-files, etc). But it would be good if someone else made that separately because if that then does not fail, it would prove that my test-harness is at fault (and not logical replication).

Will do - what I had been doing was running pgbench, waiting until the row counts on the replica pgbench_history were the same as the primary, then summing the %balance and delta fields from the primary and replica dbs and comparing. So far - all match up ok. However I'd been running a longer time frames (5 minutes), so not the same number of repetitions as yet.



Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to