Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > * Craig Ringer (cr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: >> At the moment that'd be 9.5, since that's where PostgresNode was >> introduced. But if I can find the time I'd quite like to backport >> PostgresNode to 9.4 too.
> Makes sense to me. Um ... but we still have 2 live pre-9.4 branches. If your proposal doesn't extend to back-porting all of this stuff as far as 9.2, I don't see what this is really buying. We'd still need version cutoff checks in the tests. (If you *do* propose back-patching all this stuff as far as 9.2, I'm not quite sure what I'd think about that. But the proposal as stated seems like questionable half measures.) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers