Stephen Frost <> writes:
> * Craig Ringer ( wrote:
>> At the moment that'd be 9.5, since that's where PostgresNode was
>> introduced. But if I can find the time I'd quite like to backport
>> PostgresNode to 9.4 too.

> Makes sense to me.

Um ... but we still have 2 live pre-9.4 branches.  If your proposal
doesn't extend to back-porting all of this stuff as far as 9.2,
I don't see what this is really buying.  We'd still need version cutoff
checks in the tests.

(If you *do* propose back-patching all this stuff as far as 9.2, I'm not
quite sure what I'd think about that.  But the proposal as stated seems
like questionable half measures.)

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to