Chapman Flack <c...@anastigmatix.net> writes:
> On 05/31/17 01:26, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm. I think it would be better to use DatumGetInt32 here. Arguably,
>> direct use of GET_4_BYTES and its siblings should only appear in
>> DatumGetFoo macros.
> Like so?
Looks promising offhand, but I'm too tired to check in detail right now.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
