Chapman Flack <> writes:
> On 05/31/17 01:26, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm.  I think it would be better to use DatumGetInt32 here.  Arguably,
>> direct use of GET_4_BYTES and its siblings should only appear in
>> DatumGetFoo macros.

> Like so?

Looks promising offhand, but I'm too tired to check in detail right now.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to