On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nice as it would be to add a SQL standard feature and advance the > effort to get to incremental maintenance of materialized views, and > much as I really appreciate the efforts Thomas has put into trying > to solve these problems, I agree that it is best to revert the > feature. It took years to get an in-depth review, then I was asked > not to commit it because others were working on patches that would > conflict. That just doesn't leave enough time to address these > issues before release. Fundamentally, I'm not sure that there is a > level of interest sufficient to support the effort. > > I'll give it a few days for objections before reverting. > I can only say that the lack of this feature comes up on a weekly basis on IRC, and a lot of people would be disappointed to see it reverted. .m
