On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I'm starting to like the approach of reverting the entire transition >> tables patch. Failing to consider the possibility of a plan with >> multiple ModifyTable nodes seems like a pretty fundamental design >> mistake, and I'm not eager either to ship this with that broken or try >> to fix it at this stage of the release cycle. > > Postponing the feature to v11 might be a viable solution. We don't > have any other major work that depends on it do we?
I don't think anything that depends on it was committed to v10. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
