On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Jim Van Fleet <vanfl...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> The basic idea is clear from your description, but it will be better >> if you share the patch as well. It will not only help people to >> review and provide you feedback but also allow them to test and see if >> they can reproduce the numbers you have mentioned in the mail. > > OK -- would love the feedback and any suggestions on how to mitigate the low > end problems.
Did you intend to attach a patch? > Sokolov Yura has a patch which, to me, looks good for pgbench rw > performance. Does not do so well with hammerdb (about the same as base) on > single socket and two socket. Any idea why? I think we will have to understand *why* certain things help in some situations and not others, not just *that* they do, in order to come up with a good solution to this problem. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers