On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote:
> My assumption about how transition tables ought to behave here is > based on the simple fact that we already fire both AFTER > statement-level triggers, plus my sense of aesthetics, or bias. I > admit that I might be missing the point, but if I am it would be > useful to know how. Well, either will work. My inclination is that a single statement should cause one execution of the FOR EACH STATEMENT trigger, but if a good case can be made that we should have a FOR EACH STATEMENT trigger fire for each clause within a statement -- well, it won't be a problem for matview maintenance. The biggest hurt there would be to *my* sense of aesthetics. ;-) -- Kevin Grittner VMware vCenter Server https://www.vmware.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
