Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Looking at 0001:
> - GetOldestSafeDecodingTransactionId() only guarantees to return an xid
> safe for decoding (note how procArray->replication_slot_catalog_xmin
> is checked), not one for the initial snapshot - so afaics this whole
> exercise doesn't guarantee much so far.
I happen to use CreateInitDecodingContext() in an extension, so I had to think
what the new argumen exactly means (as for the incompatibility between PG
9.6.2 and 9.6.3, I suppose preprocessor directives can handle it).
One thing I'm failing to understand is: if TRUE is passed for
need_full_snapshot, then slot->effective_xmin receives the result of
GetOldestSafeDecodingTransactionId(need_full_snapshot)
but this does include "catalog xmin".
If the value returned is determined by an existing slot which has valid
effective_catalog_xmin and invalid effective_xmin (i.e. that slot only
protects catalog tables from VACUUM but not the regular ones), then the new
slot will think it (i.e. the new slot) protects even non-catalog tables, but
that's no true.
Shouldn't the xmin_horizon be computed by this call instead?
GetOldestSafeDecodingTransactionId(!need_full_snapshot);
(If so, I think "considerCatalog" argument name would be clearer than
"catalogOnly".)
--
Antonin Houska
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de, http://www.cybertec.at
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
