On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I wrote: >> But surely the silent treatment should only apply to DSM_OP_CREATE? > > Oh ... scratch that, it *does* only apply to DSM_OP_CREATE. > > The lack of any other message before the 'could not map' failure must, > then, mean that dsm_attach() couldn't find an entry in shared memory > that it wanted to attach to. But how could that happen?
Well, as Amit points out, there are entirely legitimate ways for that to happen. If the leader finishes the whole query itself before the worker reaches the dsm_attach() call, it will call dsm_detach(), destroying the segment, and the worker will hit this ERROR. That shouldn't happen very often in the real world, because we ought not to select a parallel plan in the first place unless the query is going to take a while to run, but the select_parallel test quite deliberately disarms all of the guards that would tend to discourage such plans. Of course, as Amit also points out, it could also be the result of some bug, but I'm not sure we have any reason to think so. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers