On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 6:36 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think so because this problem has been reported previously as
> well [1][2] even before the commit in question.
> [1] - 
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1ce5a19f-3b1d-bb1c-4561-0158176f65f1%40dunslane.net
> [2] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/25861.1472215822%40sss.pgh.pa.us

Oh, good point.  So this is a longstanding bug that has possibly just
gotten easier to hit.

I still think figuring out what's going on with the
ParallelWorkerNumbers is a good plan.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to