On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 02:23:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Well, that's something we need to discuss. I originally argued for > back-patching the new rules, whatever they are (ie, run the new > pgindent on the back branches whenever we've agreed that the dust > has settled). But I'm starting to realize that that's likely to > be horrid for anyone who's carrying out-of-tree patches, as I know > a lot of packagers do for instance. We have to trade off our own > inconvenience in making back-patches against inconvenience to > people who are maintaining private patchsets.
Can't they sync up to just before our pgindent commit and run pgindent on their own code base? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
