Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes:
> If there are no new insights, I plan to proceed with the attached patch
> tomorrow. This leaves the existing view and function alone, adds
> pg_relation_is_publishable() and uses that in psql.
Hm, patch looks okay, but while eyeballing it I started to wonder
why in the world is pg_get_publication_tables marked prosecdef?
If that has any consequences at all, they're probably bad.
There are exactly no other built-in functions that have that set.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
