On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> If there are no new insights, I plan to proceed with the attached patch >> tomorrow. This leaves the existing view and function alone, adds >> pg_relation_is_publishable() and uses that in psql. > > Hm, patch looks okay, but while eyeballing it I started to wonder > why in the world is pg_get_publication_tables marked prosecdef? > If that has any consequences at all, they're probably bad. > There are exactly no other built-in functions that have that set.
Should we add that to the opr_sanity tests? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers