On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> If there are no new insights, I plan to proceed with the attached patch
>> tomorrow.  This leaves the existing view and function alone, adds
>> pg_relation_is_publishable() and uses that in psql.
> Hm, patch looks okay, but while eyeballing it I started to wonder
> why in the world is pg_get_publication_tables marked prosecdef?
> If that has any consequences at all, they're probably bad.
> There are exactly no other built-in functions that have that set.

Should we add that to the opr_sanity tests?

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to