Tom Lane wrote: > Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Also, I would like to provide the same set of options w.r.t. messages > >> logged in the server log. Here there is an additional frammish that > >> could be imagined, ie, more detail for more-serious errors. Any > >> opinions about what it should look like? > > > Not sure exactly what you're asking for here. If you're asking what > > additional detail should be included for more serious errors, > > No, I was asking whether anyone thought such behavior should be > user-controllable, and if so exactly how the controlling GUC variables > should be defined. > > One way I could imagine doing it is to split log_min_messages into > three variables, along the lines of "minimum message level to produce > a TERSE report", "minimum message level to produce a DEFAULT report", > and "minimum message level to produce a VERBOSE report". This seems > a bit inelegant though. Better ideas anyone?
I doubt someone would want to control terse/default/verbose at various levels --- I assume they would just want all their messages to be terse/default/ or verbose. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html