Hi,
On 6/21/17 9:47 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
...
>
like int8 or numeric, it won't work at all. Even for other things,
it's going to cause problems because the bit patterns won't be what
the code is expecting; e.g. bitmap scans care about the structure of
the TID, not just how many bits it is. (Due credit: Somebody, maybe
Alvaro, pointed out this problem before, at PGCon.)
Can you elaborate a bit more about this TID bit pattern issues? I do
remember that not all TIDs are valid due to safeguards on individual
fields, like for example
Assert(iptr->ip_posid < (1 << MaxHeapTuplesPerPageBits))
But perhaps there are some other issues?
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
