On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 09:42:10PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 6/21/17 22:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On 6/20/17 22:44, Noah Misch wrote: > >>> A patch has been posted, and it's being reviewed. Next update Monday. > >> > >> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly > >> send > >> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent > >> status > >> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: > >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com > > > > I'm not sure how to proceed here. Nobody is else seems terribly > > interested, and this is really a minor issue, so I don't want to muck > > around with the locking endlessly. Let's say, if there are no new > > insights by Friday, I'll pick one of the proposed patches or just close > > it without any patch. > > After some comments, a new patch has been posted, and I'll give until > Monday for review.
This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
