On 6 July 2017 at 21:04, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes: >> However, this is also an incompatible syntax change, and any attempt >> to support both the old and new syntaxes is likely to be messy, so we >> really need to get consensus on whether this is the right thing to do, >> and whether it *can* be done now for PG10. > > FWIW, I'd much rather see us get it right the first time than release > PG10 with a syntax that we'll regret later. I do not think that beta2, > or even beta3, is too late for such a change. > > I'm not taking a position on whether this proposal is actually better > than what we have. But if there's a consensus that it is, we should > go ahead and do it, not worry that it's too late. >
OK, thanks. That's good to know. Regards, Dean -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
