On 07/06/2017 01:24 PM, Dean Rasheed wrote: > On 6 July 2017 at 21:04, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes: >>> However, this is also an incompatible syntax change, and any attempt >>> to support both the old and new syntaxes is likely to be messy, so we >>> really need to get consensus on whether this is the right thing to do, >>> and whether it *can* be done now for PG10. >> >> FWIW, I'd much rather see us get it right the first time than release >> PG10 with a syntax that we'll regret later. I do not think that beta2, >> or even beta3, is too late for such a change. >> >> I'm not taking a position on whether this proposal is actually better >> than what we have. But if there's a consensus that it is, we should >> go ahead and do it, not worry that it's too late. >> > > OK, thanks. That's good to know.
I agree we should get this right the first time and I also agree with Dean's proposal, so I guess I'm a +2 Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
